<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Maximillian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maximillian.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maximillian.net</link>
	<description>Interactive Design &#38; Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 04:30:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Source Code @ SXSW</title>
		<link>http://maximillian.net/2011/03/source-code-sxsw/</link>
		<comments>http://maximillian.net/2011/03/source-code-sxsw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 17:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maximillian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SXSW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Ripley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duncan Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Gyllenhaal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Monaghan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Source Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vera Farmiga]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maximillian.net/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw Source Code last night at SXSW. It&#8217;s the second film by British director Duncan Jones (Moon) and penned by Ben Ripley who hasn&#8217;t written anything of real consequence of which I&#8217;m aware (Species 3 doesn&#8217;t count, right?). Jake Gyllenhaal, Michelle Monaghan and Vera Farmiga make up the core cast in this action-thiller that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0945513/">Source Code</a> last night at SXSW. It&#8217;s the second film by British director <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1512910/">Duncan Jones</a> (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1182345/">Moon</a>) and penned by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1618286/">Ben Ripley</a> who hasn&#8217;t written anything of real consequence of which I&#8217;m aware (Species 3 doesn&#8217;t count, right?). <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0350453/">Jake Gyllenhaal</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1157358/">Michelle Monaghan</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0267812/">Vera Farmiga</a> make up the core cast in this action-thiller that felt like it was out of the 70s or 80s (but in a good way). It&#8217;s hard to write about a movie that is build on a secret that the audience doesn&#8217;t know without ruining it, so I&#8217;ll be vague while giving my impressions of this film.</p>
<p><span id="more-250"></span></p>
<p>Source Code is set primarily in 2 locations: a Chicago-bound train and a control room in an unknown military facility. Jake&#8217;s character exists in both settings, but the leading ladies are split – Michelle (the love interest) is on the train with Jake and Vera is the officer that is tasked with helping Jake with his &#8220;mission.&#8221; That mission is to find the person behind a terrorist plot by entering what seems to be a simulation of a terrible train explosion but the catch is that he only gets 8 minutes per attempt while he lives out the last 8 minutes of some poor guy&#8217;s life (in some sort of transfer of consciousness) on the train and each time he dies, his consciousness is pulled back to the military facility.</p>
<p>First and foremost, I think that Duncan did an amazing job creating a believable environment. The shots were well executed to not bore the audience with repetition (the film shows essentially the same scene on the train 8 or 9 times with minor variation and some very large variations on some &#8220;runs&#8221;). For example, the 3rd time the viewer is brought into the train, Michelle&#8217;s arm is up, behind her head. With lots of minor variation – even when larger deviations from the original shots are planned – helped create an enjoyable viewing experience.</p>
<p>The Acting was also perfectly executed. I believed that these people were going through the whole ordeal. Vera was completely off my radar until last night when I first saw her. She exuded talent in the film and I was really impressed with how well the cast gelled. The chemistry was most definitely there between Jake and Michelle and Jake did a great job with the serious role he was playing as well as some great bits of comedy that were written perfectly for the situation.</p>
<p>The science of the film was vague and I think (just as Ben Ripley explained in a post-screening Q&amp;A) that when you strip off all the faux-science and just state that it just &#8216;works&#8217; that the viewer actually accepts it. I know that the movie is an impossible story, but I wasn&#8217;t bothered by the situation or the technology that was integral to the story. What did bother me is that the writer thought that it was better to spell out the situation and wrap it up in a way that you really get closure, rather than trusting the viewer to put the pieces together.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1375666/">Inception</a> this was not. I&#8217;d place both Inception and Source Code in the same genre as they both focus on experiences within the mind and I liked that <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0634240/">Christopher Nolan</a> didn&#8217;t feel the need to resolve Inception by pulling back the curtain and revealing 100% of what was going on. Source Code had a moment, not more than 10 minutes from where the credits roll, that was a perfect place to stop – just like Inception – that would simultaneously enrage the audience and plant the question in everyone&#8217;s mind &#8220;was it this thing or that thing?&#8221;</p>
<p>All-in-all I give Source Code high marks for originality, Duncan&#8217;s story-telling ability, and acting. I have to take off points for the writer&#8217;s insistence to remove all doubt and spell out exactly what was going on the entire movie. While it&#8217;s not a movie that I&#8217;ll be snapping up on Blu-Ray when it comes out, I do recommend that if you&#8217;re at the movie theater after April 1st and you&#8217;re looking for a fun film to enjoy on a massive screen, you should go see Source Code.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maximillian.net/2011/03/source-code-sxsw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting Ray-Ban Ad</title>
		<link>http://maximillian.net/2010/11/interesting-ray-ban-ad/</link>
		<comments>http://maximillian.net/2010/11/interesting-ray-ban-ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maximillian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Found Online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maximillian.net/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ray-ban has tossed together a nice stop-motion video using a photocopier. Which that&#8217;s not all that impressive, the video features &#8216;live action&#8217; which ups its cool quotient. Check it out after the jump.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray-ban has tossed together a nice stop-motion video using a photocopier. Which that&#8217;s not all that impressive, the video features &#8216;live action&#8217; which ups its cool quotient. Check it out after the jump.</p>
<p><span id="more-241"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://maximillian.net/2010/11/interesting-ray-ban-ad/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maximillian.net/2010/11/interesting-ray-ban-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTML5 Facts &amp; Myths</title>
		<link>http://maximillian.net/2010/10/html5-facts-myths/</link>
		<comments>http://maximillian.net/2010/10/html5-facts-myths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 19:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maximillian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Found Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portfolio.m84.net/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smashing Magazine has written an article about the facts and myths that surround HTML5. As a web developer, I frequently find that people are confused with the concept of HTML5. For those people, the Smashing Magazine article is a great place to start to understand what HTML5 and what it isn&#8217;t. Even if you aren&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.smashingmagazine.com/">Smashing Magazine</a> has written an article about <a href="http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/09/23/html5-the-facts-and-the-myths/">the facts and myths that surround HTML5</a>.</p>
<p>As a web developer, I frequently find that people are confused with the concept of HTML5. For those people, the Smashing Magazine article is a great place to start to understand what HTML5 and what it isn&#8217;t. Even if you aren&#8217;t confused by HTML5, I highly recommend reading it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maximillian.net/2010/10/html5-facts-myths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ThisIsMyPixel.com Launched</title>
		<link>http://maximillian.net/2010/10/thisismypixel-com-launched/</link>
		<comments>http://maximillian.net/2010/10/thisismypixel-com-launched/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 14:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maximillian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[My Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portfolio.m84.net/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have just launched ThisIsMyPixel.com. The site lets users design a pixel of any color they want, and then share their pixel on Twitter or Facebook. Go ahead and try it: It&#8217;s simple and fun.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just launched <a href="http://www.ThisIsMyPixel.com/">ThisIsMyPixel.com</a>. The site lets users design a pixel of any color they want, and then share their pixel on Twitter or Facebook. Go ahead and try it: It&#8217;s simple and fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maximillian.net/2010/10/thisismypixel-com-launched/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Not to Design a User Interface</title>
		<link>http://maximillian.net/2010/10/how-not-to-design-a-user-interface/</link>
		<comments>http://maximillian.net/2010/10/how-not-to-design-a-user-interface/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maximillian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portfolio.m84.net/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sure that the designer(s) and developer(s) of this site think they did a great job, but it&#8217;s just not intuitive to me at all: YouAreTheTechnology.com (may not be work safe &#8211; has semi-nude models) If you&#8217;re a designer, you have to remember that when you&#8217;re designing anything with which a user will interact, you aren&#8217;t going [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure that the designer(s) and developer(s) of this site think they did a great job, but it&#8217;s just not intuitive to me at all:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youarethetechnology.com/" target="_blank">YouAreTheTechnology.com</a> (may not be work safe &#8211; has semi-nude models)</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a designer, you have to remember that when you&#8217;re designing anything with which a user will interact, you aren&#8217;t going to be there to help them figure it out. Redesigning common elements (like scroll bars, forms elements) may negatively impact the experience as users will give up quickly and leave. It&#8217;s aggravating as a developer when a designer wants to blast the normal UI elements for fancy/dressed up ones simply because they can, because as a user, I can totally relate to feeling lost in on a site with an alien look-and-feel.</p>
<p>So be kind to your audience by giving them something that they recognize and don&#8217;t force them to learn how to use your site or they may just leave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maximillian.net/2010/10/how-not-to-design-a-user-interface/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

